|
SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - HEAVEN IS HELL 05
SOPHIA OF WISDOM III
THE SOPHIA OF ALL SOPHIA OF WISDOMS
AKA
CAROLINE E. KENNEDY________________________________
NOVEMBER 17, 2006
MARY MAGDALENE & JESUS
The picture shown on this shows a Time traveler and Ninjas
in the back ground. And there is a woman who is a Tree standing on the steps...This is Carolyn Bessette and the Harlot Jesus
is looking at is Nina Alves...I have other pictures to prove it....
WHO WAS MARY MAGDALENE?
At the Crucifixion
and Resurrection, there is a mysterious woman who is present, named Mary Magdalene. Some say she was the wife of Jesus.
Others
say she was a prostitute freed by Jesus. Still others say she
was an esoteric figure of a secret royal line in France.
Just who was this mysterious figure?
The Biblical evidence identifies a woman who anoints Jesus with an
alabaster
box at the house of a Pharisee named Simon as "a woman of the city who was a sinner."[Lk 7:37] Jesus then forgives her all
her sins, which sins He says, "are many." In the very next section, we are told that Mary Magdalene, "out of whom He had cast
seven demons," had begun following Jesus and the Apostles [Lk 8:2]. Jesus says that because the woman had been forgiven much,
she loved Him much [Lk 7:47].
Many have assumed this woman is Mary Magdalene and that she was some
sort of prostitute
because "woman of the city" could have that meaning
in some situations. The text does not explicitly identify the woman
as
Mary Magdalene or as a prostitute, however. Luke does say Mary had had
seven demons cast out of her and responded
by following Jesus. It must
have been clear to Luke as he wrote that the strong similarity between
these two women
and their juxtaposition in immediate succession would
lead many to identify the two as the same person. The gospels often
go
to some pains to avoid such confusion, for example, when John speaks of
"Judas" at the Last Supper and adds, "not
the Iscariot." So by failing
to clarify that Mary Magdalene is not the same woman, Luke in effect is
allowing us to
make that identification.
This, if correct, would lead us to a second conclusion very rapidly,
for the anointing
of Jesus is REQUIRED by an express command of Jesus
to be recorded whenever the gospel is preached [Mt 26:13]. Therefore,
because the ONLY anointing Luke records is the one by that "woman of
the city," we must conclude that this is the
same anointing as we see
recorded in the other gospels. Note what the other accounts add:
The anointing is in
the house of Simon THE LEPER of BETHANY and the
box contained "VERY PRECIOUS" ointment [Mt 26:6-13]. This anointing of
Jesus is followed WITHOUT A BREAK by Judas betraying Jesus, implying a
direct link between the anointing and Judas' decision
[Mt 26:14-15].
Mark adds the fact that this ointment in Simon's house was of a very
precious substance called
"SPIKENARD"--but someone complains, "Why was
this WASTE of the ointment made? For it might have been SOLD FOR MORE
THAN
300 PENCE."[Mk 14:3-5] That equals a YEAR'S WAGES in those days,
or roughly $20,000 in modern terms.
THIS IS CAROLYN
BESSETTE WHO SLIPPED IN BECAUSE MARY MAGDALENE KNEW THAT JESUS WAS HER FLAVIUS (A MAGICAL POWER)
Obviously, this was
a black-market ointment, something ILLEGAL, such as oil used to anoint someone KING.
JESUS WAS ABOVE KINGS...HE
WAS TO ANOINT THEM NOT BE ANOINTED....THIS IS WHAT CAUSED HIS DEATH.....SO HE DIED FOR HER SINS AND HER SINS ALONE.....
John,
at last, completes the story: The woman who anoints Jesus is
none other than Mary of Bethany, the SISTER OF MARTHA AND
LAZARUS. So
the woman was named MARY after all. And because she and her sister are
supposed to serve guests in this
house, a house we can now identify as
the house of Simon the Pharisee, a "leper" (which some say was a coded
way of
identifying a person who advocated independence from Rome, and
who was ostracized like a leper on the Sanhedrin), we must
see Simon as
the FATHER of Mary, Martha and Lazarus.
Now it becomes clear why these three siblings are living
in the same
house; it is the family estate. We know that Lazarus is wealthy when
we are told of the huge crowds that
gather when Jesus raises Lazarus
from the dead. Bethany was on the eastern slope of the Mount of Olives
--prime real
estate. Yet Lazarus' family owns a large enough estate to
have this huge throng there ("the WHOLE WORLD has gone after
Him"), and
a private tomb on the property of a PHARISEE who would want to maintain
ritual purity by keeeping his house
as far from a tomb as possible.
Simon is a wealthy Pharisee living on choice property near Jerusalem
with a house
big enough to sleep several adult men and women. It is
his daughter who anoints Jesus with contraband royal ointment in
his
presence at a dinner in honor of his son Lazarus.
This explains why a Pharisee would allow a "woman of the
city who
was a sinner" into his house and let her POUR HER OINTMENT ALL OVER
JESUS AND ONTO HIS FLOOR. Pharisees would
NEVER permit a STRANGER to
enter their home who might be "unclean" and pour oil of UNKNOWN origin
onto their floor.
(She wipes the oil on Jesus' feet also.) For the
ritually pure Pharisees this was anathema. But if this is his very
own
daughter, a woman he knew, and if he knew exactly where that oil
had come from, then the mystery vanishes.
THE
ANOINTING OIL
So where did that oil come from?
The term "SPIKE-nard" is very misleading. The Greek actually
calls
it "GENUINE nard"--which the translators change to "SPIKE-nard" on the
assumption that some copyist made a mistake.
But the correct reading
of "GENUINE" has awesome implications. It signifies that this was the
GENUINE anointing oil.
In other words, THE GENUINE royal anointing oil
of the priests and kings. The oil of KING DAVID. Of the MESSIAH, the
ANOINTED
One.
No wonder Jesus insisted they include this story in every telling of
the gospel. This was His official anointing
as Priest and King.
[The ancient origin of this alabaster box of oil is detailed in an
extensive audio/printed
report called "THE SECRETS OF PETRA." It is
far too much to cover on the web. Copies can be ordered via our NEWS
&
UPDATES page.]
But could a fallen woman anoint Jesus Priest and King?
MARY "THE MAGDALENE" AND HER FATHER
NICODEMUS
Mary and Martha are grown women living in their father's house on a
large estate. This is most unusual.
Ordinarily the only way a woman
would return to her father's house was by being widowed or divorced or
if her husband
had gone on a long journey and left her otherwise alone.
The Talmud has a curious story about a man named Nicodemus.
It says
he was one of the richest men in Jewish history. This Nicodemus had two
daughters named Mary and Martha: Martha
was a widow who returned to her
father Nicodemus' house, while Mary had married an extremely rich man
and had brought
him a huge dowry. The Talmud does not say why Mary was
living at home, but we may assume her husband travelled a great
deal.
The Talmud places this story 30 years AFTER the Biblical Nicodemus--
a generation later. Tradition says
that Nicodemus and his whole family
were ARRESTED because of their Christianity. All were exiled to Gaul
by 37 AD,
except Nicodemus, who is said to have seen them sail off from
Caesarea. Yet the Talmud seems to place the family a generation
later.
But according to Psalm 109, people convicted of capital crimes--and
the book of Acts says that professing
Christianity had become a capital
crime--had their NAMES BLOTTED OUT "unto the second generation." So it
was FORBIDDEN
for the rabbis to publicly discuss or write about someone
who had been blotted out, as Nicodemus and his family had been.
By the
shifting of the "time" of the Talmudic stories 30 years later, rabbis
could write about blotted-out events
during the "forbidden" period. We
have many Talmudic stories about Jesus, Lazarus and other blotted-out
New Testament
figures, which also exhibit a similar time-shift.
It appears, therefore, that the Talmud has coyly "resurrected" some
forbidden history of the family of Nicodemus and Mary Magdalene, which
shows she was married to one of the richest
men in her world. Who could
that be?
MARY AND JOSEPH, THE "OTHER HOLY FAMILY"...
The term "Nicodemus"
means "innocent of blood" and is hardly a name
one receives at birth. So "Simon" might well be his given name. When
Jesus
is condemned by the Sanhedrin, the vote has to be UNANIMOUS. Yet
we know that two members, Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus
do not feel
Jesus is guilty. This can only mean that Caiaphas the High Priest held
their proxies and cast their votes
for them.
The Talmud and other sources reveal that Joseph and Nicodemus were
wealthy men who travelled far from
Jerusalem, in the metals and grain
trades respectively. Because they were not always available to vote,
they had to
give their proxies to the High Priest.
Nicodemus was a "RULER" of the people on the Sanhedrin, a man of
great
wealth (he held a monopoly on grain in Jerusalem). His friend
Joseph of Arimathea was in similar circumstances. Undoubtedly,
both
men often travelled together for months at a time.
But why did they bury Jesus together?
The Jewish
law of burial left a man UNCLEAN for handling a dead body
--which would have prevented these men from eating the Passover,
if we
accept John's gospel [Jn 18:28]. But the NEXT OF KIN were REQUIRED to
bury their family members. That means
both men were related to Jesus.
Catholic tradition makes Joseph the UNCLE of Jesus' mother, Mary, but
they also
say he was YOUNGER than Mary. The Church has evolved a view
of Mary as staying a virgin AFTER giving birth to Jesus, and
this led it
to elevate Mary to a semi-divine status Rome feels is incompatible with
her having any siblings. The idea
is that her mother Anna had no other
children but Mary. But the starting point of this odd logic is Rome's
belief
in Mary remaining virgin AFTER giving birth to Jesus, an idea the
Bible goes to great lengths to refute:
The Bible
declares, for example, that Mary lost her virginity at the
birth of Jesus [Lk 2:23; Is 66:9; Rev 12:4], had sex with her
husband
[Mt 1:25], and was mother to many other children after Jesus [Mt 12:46-47;
13:55-57; 27:56,61; 28:1; Mk 6:
3-4; and many other similar passages]. To
maintain the myth of Mary keeping her virginity even after giving birth,
Rome
decided in 1871 that Mary had herself had a miraculous birth without
original sin and without any siblings. This meant
Joseph of Arimathea
had to be pushed back another generation BEFORE Mary, even though he was
younger than Mary and
was said to outlive her by 15 or 20 years.
This confusion vanishes in light of the Biblical verses cited above,
which
removes the need to falsify Mary's family structure. Joseph was her
younger brother, uncle to Jesus. When their father,
Heli Joachim, died,
Joseph took over the family's seat on the Jewish Sanhedrin. If this were
not so, Jesus could not
be David's heir. The "honored seat" Joseph held
on the Council was, of course, the seat of the House of David, the KING'S
SEAT. Jesus sat on it at age 12 [Lk 2:41-51]. Joseph of Arimathea had
to adopt Jesus by Jewish law if he believed
Jesus to be legitimate, for
Joseph was the male elder of the family and a brother had to adopt his
sister's unheired
sons.
Had Joseph been an uncle of Mary the line of inheritance would have
deviated away from Jesus: Mary would
not have had it to pass down to
Jesus in the flesh. Rome's efforts to deify Mary deny Jesus the throne
of David by
natural inheritance, contrary to Scripture [Lk 1:31-33].
So Joseph of Arimathea was obligated to adopt Jesus. The
adoption
papers are quoted by Luke in chapter 3 of his gospel. Rome admits the
genealogy there is that of Mary's side
of the family, but ignores the
fact that the "Joseph" who is adopting Jesus is her brother by using
the bizarre argument
that her husband acquired his wife's genealogy by
adopting Jesus--even though the whole point of adoption was the reverse
situation: To give Jesus the adopting male's genealogy. Had this male
been Joseph the "Carpenter" of the line of Jeconiah,
whose descendents
were cursed from sitting upon the throne, Jesus would have been cut out
of the royal inheritance
like all other men of Jeconiah's line. Only
a BROTHER of Mary could adopt Jesus and keep Jesus in the royal line of
succession
as the heir of David:
"When Jesus was about to be thirty years of age, He became by
custom [by adoption] the son
of Joseph, the son of Heli..."
[Lk 3:23, literal rendering]
All this means that Joseph of Arimathea had to be
married to a woman
of very wealthy and high status. Only such a woman would be suitable to
wed a man who held his
position. Nicodemus married his daughter Mary to
such a man. Could Mary be Joseph's wife?
The gospels state that
Jospeh of Arimathea [the city of Matthew: See
his genealogy] buried Jesus in his own UNUSED tomb in Jerusalem. Joseph
had acquired it RECENTLY, for no one in his family had died and ever been
buried in it; yet the average age of death
in those days was under thirty,
with many babies born dead. This can only mean that Joseph had obtained
the site during
his life and did not inherit it.
The common way such a tomb would come into a family was as part of a
DOWRY. But
if Joseph married Mary of BETHANY of the Mount of Olives,
then the dowry tomb would have been on the Mount of Olives and
the site
of the Crucifixion must have been near Bethany at the summit of the
Mount. This is in fact the case [See
the link below to our discussion
of "THE CRUCIFIXION"].
Now we can see that Mary was a woman of great importance.
To gain a
tomb on the summit of Olivet was one of the most sought-after desires
of every Jewish person, but hardly
anyone could achieve it. Joseph was
given a piece of land when he married Mary that he would LITERALLY die
for. But
if he were to divorce her, it would revert to Nicodemus.
THE FAMILY LINE OF MARY MAGDALENE
This man Nicodemus
was not only a member of the Sanhedrin, but a rabbi
and Pharisee and a ruler of the people. All this makes him one of
the
CHIEF SCRIBES. The house of Benjamin was given the right to keep the
written genealogies of the priests and kings
to decide which persons were
entitled to inherit. The Torah says Benjamin will "DIVIDE the SPOILS"--
that is, the
inheritiances of Israel.
Benjamin was allotted six seats on the Council. One of these seats
was occupied by the
chief elde
Yahoo Quick Search
This page has been visited  times.
 Send e-mail to:libraryofsophia3@LYCOS.COM
This page created using the webpage creation facilities
of Webspawner.
Copyright © 2007 SOPHIA OF WISDOM III - SOPHIA OF ALL SOPHIA OF
WISDOMS. All Rights Reserved
|
